Definition: When therefore Paul and Barnabas had no small dissension and disputation with them, they determined that Paul and Barnabas, and certain other of them, should go up to Jerusalem unto the apostles and elders about this question.
Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from Acts 15:2. It’s a really important part of how the early church was organized. Here's what it means in simpler terms: Basically, Paul and Barnas had a disagreement – a big argument – about something. Let’s unpack that a little further: “Paul and Barnabas…” : This refers to two leaders in the early Christian community, Paul and Barnabas. They were important figures who were spreading the gospel (the good news of Jesus). “…had no small dissension and disputation with them” : This means they had a serious disagreement – perhaps about how to best share the message or what the best way to handle certain situations. It wasn’t just a minor point; it was a real problem that needed to be addressed. “They determined…” : This is key. They decided to do something – they decided to go to leaders (the apostles and elders) in Jerusalem. What did they decide to do? They decided to meet with the leaders to discuss this disagreement further. It’s like when you have a disagreement with a friend and you want to figure out how to resolve it together. Why was this important? This verse shows that the early church wasn’t perfect! Even with wise leaders, disagreements do happen. It highlights the need for guidance and leadership when things are complicated. It also shows that they were working together to find a solution. --- Does that make sense so far? Do you want me to explain anything in more detail or perhaps connect it to a specific story? For example, would you like me to: Explain the context of this verse within the larger story of the early church? Talk about why this kind of disagreement was important for the community's growth?